Archive for October, 2006
Why I Will Not Be Filing Under the Accelerated Examination Program of the USPTO
The USPTO has a new Accelerated Examination Program that promises an issued patent within 12 months. This program has a couple essential elemhttp://www.krajec.com/index.php?/weblog_re…Technorati Tags: patent, USPTO
Accelerated Examination of Patents. Good idea? Bad?
I haven’t reviewed this topic enough to form an opinion one way or another (as to how it would benefit/harm MY clients)…yet. Hhttp://www.inventblog.com/patent/2006/10/a…Technorati Tags: patent
Evidence Based Prosecution: Non-Patent Prior Art Leads to Rejections
Imitrex - Authorized Generic Steps In
Authorized generics — brand pharmaceutical products masquerading as generics — are an increasingly common brand tactic aimed at discouraging genehttp://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/000…Technorati Tags: patent
Research Help: How many patent attorneys sit on corporate board of directors?
Help!
TTAB Finds “GOYA” and “GAYO MOUNTAIN COFFEE” Confusingly Similar for Coffee
In this Section 2(d) cancellation proceeding, Respondent Holland Coffee had a mountain to climhttp://thettablog.blogspot.com/2006/10/tta…
Evidence Based Prosecution: Non-Patent Prior Art Leads to Rejections
Quality patents depend upon our ability to find and examine prior art regardless of its form. Most prior art cited by the USPTO arrives in the formhttp://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObv…Technorati Tags: patent, patents, USPTO, law
Friday Fun : How Duct Tape is Made
… or as millions of kids say, “How Duck Tape is Made.”
Once you are done looking at the video, you might want to have a look atSupreme Court Revisits Punitive Damages
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1161…Technorati Tags: law
Microsoft v. AT&T: Export and Sale of Components of Patented Software
As predicted, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear Microsoft’s case on transnational patent law:
