Archive for November 29th, 2006
The Morning After: KSR v. Teleflex
The collective post-mortem has begun over yesterday’s oral arguments at the Supreme Court, and it appears that any seismic shifts predicted by anhttp://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterZurasT…Technorati Tags: patent
How In-House Law Departments Can Compete for Laterals
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1164…Technorati Tags: law
Finding Fishing and Climbing Gear Related, TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refusal of “METOLIUS”
Applicant G. Loomis struggled mightily, but it just could not climb the mountain to reversal of the Board’s 2(dhttp://thettablog.blogspot.com/2006/11/fin…
KSR v. Teleflex - The Supreme Court reveals its frustration with the motivation/suggestion test…and contempt for the Federal Circuit
And now we wait. Yesterday, the much-anticipated oral argument was held in KSR v. Teleflex, the Supreme Court case that
Supreme Court: Current Test of Obviousness is “Gobbledygook”
KSR v. Teleflex (Supreme Court 2006, Oral Arguments).
The doctrine of nonobviousness is the cornerstone of American patent law.&nhttp://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObv…Technorati Tags: patent, patent law, lawCAFC: Enablement for 102 Not the Same as Enablement Under 112
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the effectiveness of the prior art is not relevant but rather whether it describes the claimhttp://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/000…Technorati Tags: patent, Federal Circuit
