TTAB Denies Stoller Motion to Block Trustee’s Stipulated Dismissal of STEALTH Opposition
The TTABlog reported on October 16th (link) that the
http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2006/12/tta…
December 1st, 2006
November 30th, 2006
Fame of “HOT WHEELS” Fuels TTAB 2(d) Victory Over “HotToyz” Trademark
The Board showed the Black Flag to Stephen Daniel Scott’s application to register the mark “HotToyz”(Stylized) for magazines and Internet-based adver
http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2006/11/fam…
Indian patent filings grow at 30% clip
The Indian Patent Office is in a major growth phase - 30% increase in filings year over year. Perhaps not suprisingly, “[t]he largest number of paten
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PromoteTheP…
Technorati Tags: patent
November 29th, 2006
The Morning After: KSR v. Teleflex
The collective post-mortem has begun over yesterday's oral arguments at the Supreme Court, and it appears that any seismic shifts predicted by an
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterZurasT…
Technorati Tags: patent
How In-House Law Departments Can Compete for Laterals
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1164…
Technorati Tags: law
Finding Fishing and Climbing Gear Related, TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refusal of “METOLIUS”
Applicant G. Loomis struggled mightily, but it just could not climb the mountain to reversal of the Board’s 2(d
http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2006/11/fin…
KSR v. Teleflex - The Supreme Court reveals its frustration with the motivation/suggestion test…and contempt for the Federal Circuit
And now we wait. Yesterday, the much-anticipated oral argument was held in KSR v. Teleflex, the Supreme Court case that http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PromoteTheP…
Supreme Court: Current Test of Obviousness is “Gobbledygook”
KSR v. Teleflex (Supreme Court 2006, Oral Arguments).
The doctrine of nonobviousness is the cornerstone of American patent law.&n
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PatentlyObv…
Technorati Tags: patent, patent law, law
CAFC: Enablement for 102 Not the Same as Enablement Under 112
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the effectiveness of the prior art is not relevant but rather whether it describes the claim
http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/000…
Technorati Tags: patent, Federal Circuit
